Jaye Lapachet

J8 Consulting, San Francisco, Calif

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Portfolio
  • Sample Page

The Case Against Folksonomies

The Case Against Folksonomies

I have been thinking about metadata lately, especially after the discussion about Social Metadata Application at the Covid conference. Sort of tangentially my thoughts have been about folksonomies. When people apply metadata to some kind of record, like hashtags to posts on Instagram and Twitter, they are applying metadata. I think folksonomic terms are valid, but need to be normalized by a metadata professional so that all the relevant information can be linked together. One plural creates a new term and makes the records associated with the singular version of the hashtag inaccessible.

When I saw Guillermo Galdamez’s session on Folksonomies, I was interested in hearing what he had to say.

One thing Galdamez says is that organizing vocabularies around tasks and types of users allows us to provide greater value to the content we provide. This assumes a corporate structure, but I think the same would be true for tools such as Instagram, if it were possible for Information Professionals to take control of the hashtags there.

He also states that relying on folksonomies increases the users cognitive burden. Searchers have to think up relevant terms before they can begin to find materials they seek. if they don’t know anything about the subject they won’t know what terms to apply to a  search. On the other side, people adding content to a KMS or CMS have to think up terms that apply to their content. They may be an expert so may have no problem, but they may not. Having valid terms from which to choose helps get content into the system faster.

Eventually, there are so many terms that express the same concept that someone will have to clean up the folksonomy. It makes sense to create a taxonomy at the beginning of the process and provide the terms for users. I am also a fan of allow folksonomic terms to provide input for the taxonomy. I think such a practice can enrich a vocabulary.

Galdamez made his case in less than 5 minutes, which I thought was great. It is really nice to have shorter programs

This entry was posted in 2020 and tagged Conferences, Metadata, SLA Annual 2020 on October 6, 2020 by Jaye Lapachet.

Post navigation

← SLA 2020 Awards Ceremony Graphic Design 101: Marketing and Data Visualization Tips for the Non-Designer →

Recent Posts

  • Importance of Metadata
  • Mining Institutional Knowledge
  • Closing General Session
  • Project Management for the Information Professional
  • Reopening Libraries

Recent Comments

    Tags

    • Best wishes
    • Business
    • Conferences
    • Content Management
    • Info News
    • Information Reuse
    • Innovation
    • Knowledge Management
    • Law Firms
    • Metadata
    • SLA Annual 2020
    • Technology
    • Various & Interesting
    October 2020
    S M T W T F S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
    « Sep   Sep »

    Archives

    • September 2022
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • February 2019
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • March 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015

    Categories

    • 2015
    • 2016
    • 2017
    • 2018
    • 2019
    • 2020
    • 2022

    Contact Me!

    I'd love to work with you to improve your information organization and services. PO Box 3413 Daly City, Calif 94015-3413 jlapac [at] gmail [dot] com

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Proudly powered by WordPress